| Title |
Comparison of Illumina MiSeq and the Ion Torrent PGM and S5 platforms for whole-genome sequencing of picornaviruses and caliciviruses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Virological Methods, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113865 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel L Marine, Laura C Magaña, Christina J Castro, Kun Zhao, Anna M Montmayeur, Alexander Schmidt, Marta Diez-Valcarce, Terry Fei Fan Ng, Jan Vinjé, Cara C Burns, W Allan Nix, Paul A Rota, M Steven Oberste |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virological Methods
#2,523
of 3,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,832
of 402,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virological Methods
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.