| Title |
Anti-PfGARP activates programmed cell death of parasites and reduces severe malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2220-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dipak K. Raj, Alok Das Mohapatra, Anup Jnawali, Jenna Zuromski, Ambrish Jha, Gerald Cham-Kpu, Brett Sherman, Rachel M. Rudlaff, Christina E. Nixon, Nicholas Hilton, Andrew V. Oleinikov, Olga Chesnokov, Jordan Merritt, Sunthorn Pond-Tor, Lauren Burns, Grant Jolly, Choukri Ben Mamoun, Edward Kabyemela, Atis Muehlenbachs, Lynn Lambert, Sachy Orr-Gonzalez, Nina F. Gnädig, David A. Fidock, Sangshin Park, Jeffrey D. Dvorin, Norbert Pardi, Drew Weissman, Barbara L. Mui, Ying K. Tam, Jennifer F. Friedman, Michal Fried, Patrick E. Duffy, Jonathan D. Kurtis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 11% |
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| France | 6 | 7% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Angola | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 70% |
| Scientists | 19 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#236,344
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#13,585
of 98,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,826
of 405,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#349
of 936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.