Title |
The impact of antimalarial resistance on the genetic structure of Plasmodium falciparum in the DRC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-15779-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert Verity, Ozkan Aydemir, Nicholas F. Brazeau, Oliver J. Watson, Nicholas J. Hathaway, Melchior Kashamuka Mwandagalirwa, Patrick W. Marsh, Kyaw Thwai, Travis Fulton, Madeline Denton, Andrew P. Morgan, Jonathan B. Parr, Patrick K. Tumwebaze, Melissa Conrad, Philip J. Rosenthal, Deus S. Ishengoma, Jeremiah Ngondi, Julie Gutman, Modest Mulenga, Douglas E. Norris, William J. Moss, Benedicta A. Mensah, James L. Myers-Hansen, Anita Ghansah, Antoinette K. Tshefu, Azra C. Ghani, Steven R. Meshnick, Jeffrey A. Bailey, Jonathan J. Juliano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
Scientists | 14 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,595,496
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,490
of 55,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,460
of 382,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#704
of 1,518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.