| Title |
Visualizing variation within Global Pneumococcal Sequence Clusters (GPSCs) and country population snapshots to contextualize pneumococcal isolates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Genomics, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1099/mgen.0.000357 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca A. Gladstone, Stephanie W. Lo, Richard Goater, Corin Yeats, Ben Taylor, James Hadfield, John A. Lees, Nicholas J. Croucher, Andries J. van Tonder, Leon J. Bentley, Fu Xiang Quah, Anne J. Blaschke, Nicole L. Pershing, Carrie L. Byington, Veeraraghavan Balaji, Waleria Hryniewicz, Betuel Sigauque, K.L. Ravikumar, Samanta Cristine Grassi Almeida, Theresa J. Ochoa, Pak Leung Ho, Mignon du Plessis, Kedibone M. Ndlangisa, Jennifer E. Cornick, Brenda Kwambana-Adams, Rachel Benisty, Susan A. Nzenze, Shabir A. Madhi, Paulina A. Hawkins, Andrew J. Pollard, Dean B. Everett, Martin Antonio, Ron Dagan, Keith P. Klugman, Anne von Gottberg, Benjamin J. Metcalf, Yuan Li, Bernard W. Beall, Lesley McGee, Robert F. Breiman, David M. Aanensen, Stephen D. Bentley, Patrick E. Akpaka, Krow Ampofo, Houria Belabbès, Godfrey Bigogo, Abdullah W . Brooks, Philip E. Carter, Stuart C. Clarke, Alejandra Corso, Maria Cristina de Cunto Brandileone, Alexander Davydov, Idrissa Diawara, Sanjay Doiphode, Ekaterina Egorova, Naima Elmdaghri, Özgen Köseoglu Eser, Diego Faccone, Rebecca Ford, Paula Gagetti, Noga Givon-Lavi, Hasanuzzaman, Kristina G. Hulten, Margaret Ip, Aurelie Kapusta, Rama Kandasamy, Tamara Kastrin, Jeremy Keenan, Pierra Y. Law, Deborah Lehmann, Jennifer Moïsi, Helio Mucavele, Michele Nurse-Lucas, Stephen K. Obaro, Metka Paragi, Ewa Sadowy, Samir K. Saha, Eric Sampane-Donkor, Shamala Devi Sekaran, Sadia Shakoor, Shrijana Shrestha, Anna Skoczynska, Soo Ko, Somporn Srifuengfung, Peggy-Estelle Tientcheu, Leonid Titov, Paul Turner, Yulia Urban, Jennifer Verani, Elena Voropaeva, Nicole Wolter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 20 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 16 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,732,712
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Genomics
#151
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,955
of 411,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Genomics
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.