| Title |
Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: a consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30041-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raul D Santos, Samuel S Gidding, Robert A Hegele, Marina A Cuchel, Philip J Barter, Gerald F Watts, Seth J Baum, Alberico L Catapano, M John Chapman, Joep C Defesche, Emanuela Folco, Tomas Freiberger, Jacques Genest, G Kees Hovingh, Mariko Harada-Shiba, Steve E Humphries, Ann S Jackson, Pedro Mata, Patrick M Moriarty, Frederick J Raal, Khalid Al-Rasadi, Kausik K Ray, Zelijko Reiner, Eric J G Sijbrands, Shizuya Yamashita, International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 23% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| Poland | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 16% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 12% |
| Other | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 19% |
| Unknown | 100 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 120 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#908,557
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#608
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,949
of 354,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.