| Title |
Ten recommendations for supporting open pathogen genomic analysis in public health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-020-0935-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allison Black, Duncan R. MacCannell, Thomas R. Sibley, Trevor Bedford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 8% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 97 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 74 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#302,715
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,128
of 9,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,882
of 435,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#51
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.