| Title |
Efficacy and safety of artesunate–amodiaquine and artemether–lumefantrine and prevalence of molecular markers associated with resistance, Guinea: an open-label two-arm randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03290-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdoul Habib Beavogui, Alioune Camara, Alexandre Delamou, Mamadou Saliou Diallo, Abdoulaye Doumbouya, Karifa Kourouma, Patrice Bouedouno, Timothée Guilavogui, Samaly dos Santos Souza, Julia Kelley, Eldin Talundzic, Aissata Fofana, Mateusz M. Plucinski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Guinea | 2 | 15% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,158,337
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#760
of 5,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,683
of 400,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#18
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.