Title |
Assessing Solid Organ Donors and Monitoring Transplant Recipients for Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus Infection — U.S. Public Health Service Guideline, 2020
|
---|---|
Published in |
MMWR Recommendations & Reports, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.rr6904a1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jefferson M. Jones, Ian Kracalik, Marilyn E. Levi, James S. Bowman, James J. Berger, Danae Bixler, Kate Buchacz, Anne Moorman, John T. Brooks, Sridhar V. Basavaraju |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 61 | 58% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Puerto Rico | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Croatia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 81 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 14% |
Scientists | 6 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 40 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#243,236
of 25,487,317 outputs
Outputs from MMWR Recommendations & Reports
#25
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,994
of 434,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR Recommendations & Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,487,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them