| Title |
A federated ecosystem for sharing genomic, clinical data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaf6162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health* |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 12% |
| Spain | 15 | 6% |
| Canada | 9 | 4% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Greece | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 84 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 137 | 57% |
| Scientists | 93 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#184,635
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,433
of 82,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,600
of 357,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#96
of 1,145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.