↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory illness caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, and use of diphtheria anti-toxin in the United States, 1996-2018

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory illness caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, and use of diphtheria anti-toxin in the United States, 1996-2018
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2020
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciaa1218
Pubmed ID
Authors

John O Otshudiema, Anna M Acosta, Pamela K Cassiday, Stephen C Hadler, Susan Hariri, Tejpratap S P Tiwari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 27 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 27 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,347,515
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#13,873
of 16,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,516
of 426,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#410
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.