| Title |
Comparison of A(H3N2) neutralizing antibody responses elicited by 2018-2019 season quadrivalent influenza vaccines derived from eggs, cells, and recombinant hemagglutinin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciaa1352 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Wang, Esmeralda Alvarado-Facundo, Russell Vassell, Limone Collins, Rhonda E Colombo, Anuradha Ganesan, Casey Geaney, David Hrncir, Tahaniyat Lalani, Ana Elizabeth Markelz, Ryan C Maves, Bruce McClenathan, Katrin Mende, Stephanie A Richard, Christina Schofield, Srihari Seshadri, Christina Spooner, Gregory C Utz, Tyler E Warkentien, Min Levine, Christian L Coles, Timothy H Burgess, Maryna Eichelberger, Carol D Weiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,640,755
of 24,483,002 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#13,387
of 16,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,456
of 406,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#384
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,483,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.