| Title |
Cryptic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Washington state
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abc0523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trevor Bedford, Alexander L. Greninger, Pavitra Roychoudhury, Lea M. Starita, Michael Famulare, Meei-Li Huang, Arun Nalla, Gregory Pepper, Adam Reinhardt, Hong Xie, Lasata Shrestha, Truong N. Nguyen, Amanda Adler, Elisabeth Brandstetter, Shari Cho, Danielle Giroux, Peter D. Han, Kairsten Fay, Chris D. Frazar, Misja Ilcisin, Kirsten Lacombe, Jover Lee, Anahita Kiavand, Matthew Richardson, Thomas R. Sibley, Melissa Truong, Caitlin R. Wolf, Deborah A. Nickerson, Mark J. Rieder, Janet A. Englund, James Hadfield, Emma B. Hodcroft, John Huddleston, Louise H. Moncla, Nicola F. Müller, Richard A. Neher, Xianding Deng, Wei Gu, Scot Federman, Charles Chiu, Jeffrey S. Duchin, Romesh Gautom, Geoff Melly, Brian Hiatt, Philip Dykema, Scott Lindquist, Krista Queen, Ying Tao, Anna Uehara, Suxiang Tong, Duncan MacCannell, Gregory L. Armstrong, Geoffrey S. Baird, Helen Y. Chu, Jay Shendure, Keith R. Jerome, Helen Y. Chu, Michael Boeckh, Janet A. Englund, Michael Famulare, Barry R. Lutz, Deborah A. Nickerson, Mark J. Rieder, Lea M. Starita, Matthew Thompson, Jay Shendure, Trevor Bedford, Amanda Adler, Elisabeth Brandstetter, Shari Cho, Chris D. Frazar, Danielle Giroux, Peter D. Han, James Hadfield, Shichu Huang, Michael L. Jackson, Anahita Kiavand, Louise E. Kimball, Kirsten Lacombe, Jennifer Logue, Victoria Lyon, Kira L. Newman, Matthew Richardson, Thomas R. Sibley, Monica L. Zigman Suchsland, Melissa Truong, Caitlin R. Wolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 268 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 27% |
| Spain | 14 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 124 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 187 | 70% |
| Scientists | 51 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 257 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 23% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 73 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 278. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#130,495
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,118
of 83,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,067
of 427,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#133
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.