↓ Skip to main content

FDA drug labeling: rich resources to facilitate precision medicine, drug safety, and regulatory science

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Discovery Today, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
FDA drug labeling: rich resources to facilitate precision medicine, drug safety, and regulatory science
Published in
Drug Discovery Today, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Fang, Stephen C. Harris, Zhichao Liu, Guangxu Zhou, Guoping Zhang, Joshua Xu, Lilliam Rosario, Paul C. Howard, Weida Tong

Abstract

Here, we provide a concise overview of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labeling, which details drug products, drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and more. Labeling data have been collected over several decades by the FDA and are an important resource for regulatory research and decision making. However, navigating through these data is challenging. To aid such navigation, the FDALabel database was developed, which contains a set of approximately 80000 labeling data. The full-text searching capability of FDALabel and querying based on any combination of specific sections, document types, market categories, market date, and other labeling information makes it a powerful and attractive tool for a variety of applications. Here, we illustrate the utility of FDALabel using case scenarios in pharmacogenomics biomarkers and ADR studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 21%
Chemistry 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug Discovery Today
#1,332
of 2,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,147
of 367,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Discovery Today
#22
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.