↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of blood collection filter papers for HIV-1 DNA PCR

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Virology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of blood collection filter papers for HIV-1 DNA PCR
Published in
Journal of Clinical Virology, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.06.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvina Masciotra, Samoel Khamadi, Ebi Bilé, Adrian Puren, Peter Fonjungo, Shon Nguyen, Mulu Girma, Robert Downing, Artur Ramos, Shambavi Subbarao, Dennis Ellenberger

Abstract

The collection of dried blood spots (DBS) on Whatman 903 cards has facilitated for years the detection of HIV-1 in infants by DNA PCR as early as 4-6 weeks after birth in resource-limited settings (RLS), but alternate blood collection devices are proving to be necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Virology
#1,527
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,007
of 178,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Virology
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.