↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacogenomics Knowledge for Personalized Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1530 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1402 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Pharmacogenomics Knowledge for Personalized Medicine
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, September 2012
DOI 10.1038/clpt.2012.96
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Whirl‐Carrillo, E M McDonagh, J M Hebert, L Gong, K Sangkuhl, C F Thorn, R B Altman, T E Klein

Abstract

The Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) is a resource that collects, curates, and disseminates information about the impact of human genetic variation on drug responses. It provides clinically relevant information, including dosing guidelines, annotated drug labels, and potentially actionable gene-drug associations and genotype-phenotype relationships. Curators assign levels of evidence to variant-drug associations using well-defined criteria based on careful literature review. Thus, PharmGKB is a useful source of high-quality information supporting personalized medicine-implementation projects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1366 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 254 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 202 14%
Student > Master 192 14%
Researcher 188 13%
Other 72 5%
Other 233 17%
Unknown 261 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 298 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 207 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 202 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 146 10%
Computer Science 60 4%
Other 178 13%
Unknown 311 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,761,456
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#253
of 4,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,153
of 193,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.