| Title |
A Clinician‐Driven Automated System for Integration of Pharmacogenetic Interpretations Into an Electronic Medical Record
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/clpt.2012.140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J K Hicks, K R Crews, J M Hoffman, N M Kornegay, M R Wilkinson, R Lorier, A Stoddard, W Yang, C Smith, C A Fernandez, S J Cross, C Haidar, D K Baker, S C Howard, W E Evans, U Broeckel, M V Relling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 78% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,221,971
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#867
of 4,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,136
of 189,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.