| Title |
Metagenome-wide association studies: fine-mining the microbiome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Microbiology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Wang, Huijue Jia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 58% |
| Scientists | 15 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 936 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 912 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 203 | 22% |
| Researcher | 188 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 129 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 85 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 137 | 15% |
| Unknown | 152 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 247 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 235 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 72 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 3% |
| Other | 91 | 10% |
| Unknown | 193 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,121,762
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#528
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,963
of 374,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.