Title |
Including the initial newborn screening bloodspot collection device serial number on birth certificates: basis and recommendations from the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1038/gim.2012.121 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bradford L. Therrell, Colleen Wu |
Abstract |
We provide background information/education for national recommendations to include initial newborn screening dried bloodspot serial numbers in electronic birth registrations. Mutual data linking would provide quality checks for each data source, determinations of percentages of newborns screened, and identification of locations where screening is lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,420
of 2,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,065
of 191,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.