Title |
A smoking-associated 7-gene signature for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Oncology, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.3892/ijo.2012.1556 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
YING-WOOI WAN, REBECCA A. RAESE, JAMES E. FORTNEY, CHANGCHANG XIAO, DAJIE LUO, JOHN CAVENDISH, LAURA F. GIBSON, VINCENT CASTRANOVA, YONG QIAN, NANCY LAN GUO |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 29% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 19% |
Computer Science | 3 | 14% |
Engineering | 3 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,754,299
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Oncology
#267
of 2,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,999
of 163,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Oncology
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.