| Title |
Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Testing Practice in 2014: Results of a College of American Pathologists National Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5858/arpa.2016-0061-cp |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chengquan Zhao, Barbara A Crothers, Mohiedean Ghofrani, Zaibo Li, Rhona J. Souers, Mujtaba Hussain, Fang Fan, Idris Tolgay Ocal, Kelly Goodrich, Rulong Shen, Diane D. Davey |
| Abstract |
-College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys are used to establish national benchmarks for laboratories. -To investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping testing practice patterns in laboratories in 2014. -Data were analyzed from the CAP HPV Genotyping Practices Supplemental Questionnaire distributed to 749 laboratories participating in the CAP Human Papillomavirus (High Risk) for Cytology Program. -Six hundred four of 749 laboratories (80.6%) responded to the survey. More laboratories offered HPV genotyping testing and performed in-house HPV genotyping testing as compared to previous surveys. The Roche cobas HPV test was the most commonly used genotyping method (37.0%; 160 of 433), followed by Hologic Aptima HPV16 18/45 (26.1%; 113 of 433) and Hologic Cervista HPV16/18 (14.3%; 62 of 433). Most laboratories (287 of 399; 71.9%) offered HPV genotyping for high-risk HPV cases regardless of Papanicolaou (Pap) test results and patient age; this pattern was more common in laboratories using cobas. The remaining laboratories specifically offered testing to women with a negative Pap test result at age 30 years and older (65.2%, 73 of 112) or all ages (37.5%, 42 of 112). The median reporting rates of HPV16 and/or HPV18 positivity were 20.6%, 25.7%, 21.1%, and 57.4% for women with positive high-risk HPV adjunctive negative Pap results, atypical squamous cells of undermined significance, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and high-grade squamous lesion, respectively. -Human papillomavirus genotyping testing has increased. Roche cobas and Hologic Aptima genotype methods were the most common, and laboratories using cobas usually offered genotyping regardless of Pap test result and age. The data provide a baseline and trend of HPV genotyping test practices in 2014. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 27% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,708,020
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#681
of 2,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,797
of 367,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#41
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.