| Title |
Good Laboratory Standards for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Cancer Panel Tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.4132/jptm.2017.03.14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jihun Kim, Woong-Yang Park, Nayoung K. D. Kim, Se Jin Jang, Sung-Min Chun, Chang-Ohk Sung, Jene Choi, Young-Hyeh Ko, Yoon-La Choi, Hyo Sup Shim, Jae-Kyung Won |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 24% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
#40
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,439
of 325,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.