↓ Skip to main content

Decoding noises in HIV computational genotyping

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Decoding noises in HIV computational genotyping
Published in
Virology, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.virol.2017.08.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

MingRui Jia, Timothy Shaw, Xing Zhang, Dong Liu, Ye Shen, Amara E. Ezeamama, Chunfu Yang, Ming Zhang

Abstract

Lack of a consistent and reliable genotyping system can critically impede HIV genomic research on pathogenesis, fitness, virulence, drug resistance, and genomic-based healthcare and treatment. At present, mis-genotyping, i.e., background noises in molecular genotyping, and its impact on epidemic surveillance is unknown. For the first time, we present a comprehensive assessment of HIV genotyping quality. HIV sequence data were retrieved from worldwide published records, and subjected to a systematic genotyping assessment pipeline. Results showed that mis-genotyped cases occurred at 4.6% globally, with some regional and high-risk population heterogeneities. Results also revealed a consistent mis-genotyping pattern in gp120 in all studied populations except the group of men who have sex with men. Our study also suggests novel virus diversities in the mis-genotyped cases. Finally, this study reemphasizes the importance of implementing a standardized genotyping pipeline to avoid genotyping disparity and to advance our understanding of virus evolution in various epidemiological settings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%