↓ Skip to main content

Current WHO guidelines and the critical role of immunohistochemical markers in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): Moving from targeted therapy to immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cancer Biology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,449)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
550 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
Title
Current WHO guidelines and the critical role of immunohistochemical markers in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): Moving from targeted therapy to immunotherapy
Published in
Seminars in Cancer Biology, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lais Osmani, Frederic Askin, Edward Gabrielson, Qing Kay Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 398 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Student > Master 34 9%
Researcher 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 163 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 4%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 178 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,669,774
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#34
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,896
of 446,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.