↓ Skip to main content

Host factors that influence mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: genetics, coinfections, behavior and nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Future Virology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Host factors that influence mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: genetics, coinfections, behavior and nutrition
Published in
Future Virology, November 2011
DOI 10.2217/fvl.11.119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sascha R Ellington, Caroline C King, Athena P Kourtis

Abstract

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) is the most important mode of HIV-1 acquisition among infants and children and it can occur in utero, intrapartum and postnatally through breastfeeding. Great progress has been made in preventing MTCT through use of antiretroviral regimens during gestation, labor/delivery and breastfeeding. The mechanisms of MTCT, however, are multifactorial and remain incompletely understood. This review focuses on select host factors affecting MTCT, in particular genetic factors, coexisting infections, behavioral factors and nutrition. Whereas much emphasis has been placed on decreasing maternal HIV-1 viral load, an important determinant of MTCT, through use of antiretroviral agents, complementary focus on overall maternal health is often neglected. By addressing coinfections in mothers and infants, improving the mother's nutritional status and modifying risky behaviors and practices, not only is maternal and child health improved, but a direct benefit in reducing MTCT can be derived. The study of genetic variations in susceptibility to HIV-1 infection is rapidly evolving, and the future is likely to bring revolutionary changes in HIV-1 prevention by enhancing natural resistance to infection and by individually tailoring pharmacologic regimens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 35 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 40 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Future Virology
#108
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,714
of 245,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Virology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.