↓ Skip to main content

Consensus Statement of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics in Diagnosis and Management of Hemophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Pediatrics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Consensus Statement of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics in Diagnosis and Management of Hemophilia
Published in
Indian Pediatrics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13312-018-1302-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anupam Sachdeva, Vinod Gunasekaran, H. N. Ramya, Jasmita Dass, Jyoti Kotwal, Tulika Seth, Satyaranjan Das, Kapil Garg, Manas Kalra, Sirisha Rani S., Anand Prakash, ‘Consensus in Diagnosis and Management of Hemophilia’ Committee, Indian Academy of Pediatrics

Abstract

Despite having standard principles of management of hemophilia, treatment differs in various countries depending on available resources. Guideline for management of hemophilia in Indian setting is essential. Indian Academy of Pediatrics conducted a consultative meeting on Hemophilia on 18th September, 2016 in New Delhi, which was attended by experts in the field working across India. Scientific literature was reviewed, and guidelines were drafted. All expert committee members reviewed the final manuscript. To bring out consensus guidelines in diagnosis and management of Hemophilia in India. Specific factor assays confirm diagnosis and classify hemophilia according to residual factor activity (mild 5-40%, moderate 1-5%, severe <1%). Genetic testing helps in identifying carriers, and providing genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. Patients with hemophilia should be managed by multi-specialty team approach. Continuous primary prophylaxis (at least low-dose regimen of 10-20 IU/kg twice or thrice per week) is recommended in severe hemophilia with dose tailored as per response. Factor replacement remains the mainstay of treating acute bleeds (dose and duration depends on body weight, site and severity of bleed). Factor concentrates (plasma derived or recombinant), if available, are preferred over blood components. Other supportive measures (rest, ice, compression, and elevation) should be instantly initiated. Long-term complications include musculoskeletal problems, development of inhibitors and transfusion-transmitted infections, which need monitoring. Adequate vaccination of children with hemophilia (with precautions) is emphasized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Indian Pediatrics
#666
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,362
of 340,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Pediatrics
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.