| Title |
Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Lynne T Braun, Chiadi E Ndumele, Sidney C Smith, Laurence S Sperling, Salim S Virani, Roger S Blumenthal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| Japan | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,264,508
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,024
of 16,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,733
of 359,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#92
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.