| Title |
Thought leader perspectives on benefits and harms in precision medicine research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0207842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura M. Beskow, Catherine M. Hammack, Kathleen M. Brelsford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,090,935
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,184
of 197,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,861
of 437,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,132
of 3,138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.