↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing: Research technologies, clinical applications and ethical considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Perinatology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing: Research technologies, clinical applications and ethical considerations
Published in
Seminars in Perinatology, October 2018
DOI 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fani Memi, Aglaia Ntokou, Irinna Papangeli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 355 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 24%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Researcher 18 5%
Student > Postgraduate 9 3%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 160 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Engineering 21 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 163 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,142,252
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Perinatology
#327
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,181
of 357,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Perinatology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.