↓ Skip to main content

The Challenges of Diagnostic Imaging in the Era of Big Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
The Challenges of Diagnostic Imaging in the Era of Big Data
Published in
Journal of Clinical Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.3390/jcm8030316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Aiello, Carlo Cavaliere, Antonio D’Albore, Marco Salvatore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 41 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Computer Science 15 14%
Unspecified 5 5%
Engineering 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 50 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,670,143
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#8,647
of 12,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,986
of 352,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#249
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.