↓ Skip to main content

BIM deletion polymorphism predicts poor response to EGFR-TKIs in nonsmall cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine (Wolters Kluwer), March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
BIM deletion polymorphism predicts poor response to EGFR-TKIs in nonsmall cell lung cancer
Published in
Medicine (Wolters Kluwer), March 2019
DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000014568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenxia Su, Xiaoyun Zhang, Xin Cai, Meiyu Peng, Fengbin Wang, Yuliang Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#23,084,818
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Medicine (Wolters Kluwer)
#12,401
of 16,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,145
of 366,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine (Wolters Kluwer)
#325
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.