| Title |
Using Dispensing Data to Evaluate Adherence Implementation Rates in Community Pharmacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.00130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Torres-Robles, Elyssa Wiecek, Rachelle Cutler, Barry Drake, Shalom I. Benrimoj, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| Austria | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,977,810
of 24,083,187 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,261
of 17,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,782
of 357,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#81
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,083,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.