↓ Skip to main content

Big data analytics in adult congenital heart disease: why coding matters.

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Big data analytics in adult congenital heart disease: why coding matters.
Published in
European Heart Journal, March 2019
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Folkert W Asselbergs, Folkert J Meijboom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,039,988
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#7,683
of 10,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,614
of 351,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#155
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.