| Title |
Mutational Analysis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 Identifies New Roles of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden for Patient Outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.18.01798 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federico Innocenti, Fang-Shu Ou, Xueping Qu, Tyler J. Zemla, Donna Niedzwiecki, Rachel Tam, Shilpi Mahajan, Richard M. Goldberg, Monica M. Bertagnolli, Charles D. Blanke, Hanna Sanoff, James Atkins, Blasé Polite, Alan P. Venook, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Omar Kabbarah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 15% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Russia | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 24% |
| Scientists | 16 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#454,517
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#904
of 22,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,272
of 366,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#22
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.