↓ Skip to main content

Cost-minimization analysis of GSTP1c.313A>G genotyping for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting: A Bayesian inference approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Cost-minimization analysis of GSTP1c.313A>G genotyping for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting: A Bayesian inference approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0213929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ligia Traldi Macedo, Vinicius Eduardo Ferrari, Juliana Carron, Ericka Francislaine Dias Costa, Leisa Lopes-Aguiar, Gustavo Jacob Lourenço, Carmen Silvia Passos Lima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,564,321
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#133,556
of 197,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,282
of 351,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,021
of 2,990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.