| Title |
Burden of unique and low prevalence somatic mutations correlates with cancer survival
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-41015-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikolai Klebanov, Mykyta Artomov, William B. Goggins, Emma Daly, Mark J. Daly, Hensin Tsao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,859,327
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#17,092
of 136,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,626
of 358,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#621
of 4,310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.