| Title |
Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Decision Support System for Hypertension Management in the Primary Care Setting in Brazil: Mixed-Methods Field Study on Usability, Feasibility, and Utility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JMIR mHealth and uHealth, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2196/mhealth.9869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Vitório Silveira, Milena Soriano Marcolino, Elaine Leandro Machado, Camila Gonçalves Ferreira, Maria Beatriz Moreira Alkmim, Elmiro Santos Resende, Bárbara Couto Carvalho, André Pires Antunes, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 74 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,756,655
of 23,668,780 outputs
Outputs from JMIR mHealth and uHealth
#1,007
of 2,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,165
of 352,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JMIR mHealth and uHealth
#48
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,668,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.