| Title |
Automation and artificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10408363.2018.1561640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Naugler, Deirdre L. Church |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 10% |
| Engineering | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 61 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,105,143
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#42
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,366
of 350,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them