| Title |
Universal endometrial cancer tumor typing: How much has immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and MLH1 methylation improved the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome across the population?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cncr.32203 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan M. Kahn, Sushmita Gordhandas, Brandon Paul Maddy, Becky Baltich Nelson, Gulce Askin, Paul J. Christos, Thomas A. Caputo, Eloise Chapman‐Davis, Kevin Holcomb, Melissa K. Frey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,292,639
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#1,933
of 14,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,620
of 366,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#40
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.