| Title |
Genetic Characterization of Measles and Rubella Viruses Detected Through Global Measles and Rubella Elimination Surveillance, 2016–2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6826a3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin E. Brown, Paul A. Rota, James L. Goodson, David Williams, Emily Abernathy, Makoto Takeda, Mick N. Mulders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 46% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Scientists | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#926,887
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#1,768
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,703
of 363,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#28
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 336.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.