| Title |
Notes from the Field: Targeted Biomonitoring for GenX and Other Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Following Detection of Drinking Water Contamination — North Carolina, 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6829a4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie R. Pritchett, Jessica L. Rinsky, Beth Dittman, Ariel Christensen, Rick Langley, Zack Moore, Aaron T. Fleischauer, Kate Koehler, Antonia M. Calafat, Rachel Rogers, Laconial Esters, Rodney Jenkins, Faye Collins, Debra Conner, Patrick Breysse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,091,498
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#3,205
of 4,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,438
of 360,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#60
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 335.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.