| Title |
Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C Simone Sutherland, Zanfina Ademi, Joëlle Michaud, Nadine Schur, Myriam Lingg, Arjun Bhadhuri, Thierry D. Pache, Johannes Bitzer, Pierre Suchon, Valerie Albert, Kurt E. Hersberger, Goranka Tanackovic, Matthias Schwenkglenks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,793,181
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#15,442
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,413
of 381,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#502
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.