↓ Skip to main content

Development of an RNA Strand-Specific Hybridization Assay To Differentiate Replicating versus Nonreplicating Influenza A Viruses.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Development of an RNA Strand-Specific Hybridization Assay To Differentiate Replicating versus Nonreplicating Influenza A Viruses.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2020
DOI 10.1128/jcm.00252-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genyan Yang, Erin N Hodges, Jörn Winter, Natosha Zanders, Svetlana Shcherbik, Tatiana Bousse, Janna R Murray, A K M Muraduzzaman, Mahbubur Rahman, A S M Alamgir, Meerjady Sabrina Flora, Lenee Blanton, John R Barnes, David E Wentworth, C Todd Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,955,214
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#5,444
of 14,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,228
of 429,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#57
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.