| Title |
Whole genome and in-silico analyses of G1P[8] rotavirus strains from pre- and post-vaccination periods in Rwanda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-69973-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebotsana Rasebotsa, Peter N. Mwangi, Milton T. Mogotsi, Saheed Sabiu, Nonkululeko B. Magagula, Kebareng Rakau, Jeannine Uwimana, Leon Mutesa, Narcisse Muganga, Didier Murenzi, Lisine Tuyisenge, Jose Jaimes, Mathew D. Esona, Michael D. Bowen, M. Jeffrey Mphahlele, Mapaseka L. Seheri, Jason M. Mwenda, Martin M. Nyaga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,082,701
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#56,182
of 126,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,387
of 399,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,791
of 3,681 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,681 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.