Title |
Corrigendum: Updated classification of norovirus genogroups and genotypes.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Virology, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1099/jgv.0.001475 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Preeti Chhabra, Miranda de Graaf, Gabriel I Parra, Martin Chi-Wai Chan, Kim Green, Vito Martella, Qiuhong Wang, Peter A White, Kazuhiko Katayama, Harry Vennema, Marion P G Koopmans, Jan Vinjé |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 31% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,055,602
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Virology
#920
of 6,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,290
of 399,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Virology
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.