| Title |
Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Practical Neurology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/practneurol-2013-000782 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V Nadarajan, R J Perry, J Johnson, D J Werring |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% |
| Thailand | 9 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 10% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 64 | 20% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 173 | 53% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 81 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#463,865
of 25,999,665 outputs
Outputs from Practical Neurology
#23
of 1,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,447
of 323,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Practical Neurology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,999,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.