You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring quality of family planning counselling and its effects on uptake of contraceptives in public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: A cross-sectional analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0239565 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arnab K. Dey, Sarah Averbach, Anvita Dixit, Amit Chakraverty, Nabamallika Dehingia, Dharmendra Chandurkar, Kultar Singh, Vikas Choudhry, Jay G. Silverman, Anita Raj |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,371,375
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,714
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,964
of 439,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,136
of 2,928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.