↓ Skip to main content

History of intimate partner violence is associated with sex work but not sexually transmitted infection among HIV-positive female drinkers in Russia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STD & AIDS, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History of intimate partner violence is associated with sex work but not sexually transmitted infection among HIV-positive female drinkers in Russia
Published in
International Journal of STD & AIDS, June 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956462412472809
Pubmed ID
Authors

L A Urada, A Raj, D M Cheng, E Quinn, C Bridden, E A Blokhina, E Krupitsky, J H Samet

Abstract

This paper assesses the associations between intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and sexual risks among HIV-positive female drinkers in St Petersburg, Russia. Survey and STI data were analysed from 285 women in HERMITAGE, a secondary prevention study of HIV-positive heavy drinkers. Logistic and Poisson regression analyses assessed associations of IPV with STI and risky sex. Most women (78%) experienced IPV and 19% were STI positive; 15% sold sex. IPV was not significantly associated with STI, but was with selling sex (adjusted odds ratio = 3.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-12.43). In conclusion, IPV is common and associated with sex trade involvement among Russian HIV-positive female drinkers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Social Sciences 17 17%
Psychology 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,153,791
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STD & AIDS
#1,097
of 2,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,997
of 197,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STD & AIDS
#30
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.