You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Leaving no one behind: can the Family Planning Estimation Tool help?
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet Global Health, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30050-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anita Raj, Lotus McDougal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
India | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Mali | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,449,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#2,141
of 3,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,504
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#55
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.