↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Impact of Underage Sex Work Among Female Sex Workers in Two Mexico–US Border Cities

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the Impact of Underage Sex Work Among Female Sex Workers in Two Mexico–US Border Cities
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-0063-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shira M. Goldenberg, Gudelia Rangel, Alicia Vera, Thomas L. Patterson, Daniela Abramovitz, Jay G. Silverman, Anita Raj, Steffanie A. Strathdee

Abstract

Although sex work and younger age increase HIV vulnerability, empirical data regarding the impacts of underage sex work are lacking. We explored associations between features of the risk environment, sex work, and drug use history, and underage sex work entry among 624 female sex workers (FSWs) in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Forty-one percent (n = 253) of women began sex work as minors, among whom HIV and any STI/HIV prevalence were 5.2 and 60.7%. Factors independently associated with increased odds of underage sex work were inhalants as the first drug used, forced first injection, number of drug treatment attempts, and recent receptive syringe sharing. Number of recent condom negotiation attempts with steady partners and depression as a reason for first injecting were negatively associated with underage entry. These results underscore the importance of efforts to prevent underage sex work and the wider factors contributing to HIV risk among vulnerable youth and underage FSWs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 35 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 21%
Psychology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 39 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,260,728
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#618
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,877
of 141,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.