You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of a Gender Equity and Family Planning Intervention for Married Men and Couples in Rural India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0153190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Raj, Mohan Ghule, Julie Ritter, Madhusudana Battala, Velhal Gajanan, Saritha Nair, Anindita Dasgupta, Jay G. Silverman, Donta Balaiah, Niranjan Saggurti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 267 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 14% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#516,100
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,086
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,582
of 327,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#177
of 4,877 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,877 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.